Skip to main content

In a recent blog post about a motion of no confidence in the Education Minister, it was noted that reason the motion was brought before the Assembly was because Paul Givan took part in a delegation of unionist politicians who visited Israel – something which many nationalists took exception to. The purpose of this post is to give some wider context as to why the unionist/nationalist divide in Northern Ireland also affects the way many view events in the Middle East.

 

The Israel–Palestine conflict resonates strongly in Northern Ireland because many people there interpret it through the lens of their own history of division, nationalism, and contested statehood. Although the contexts are very different, communities in Northern Ireland often project familiar themes onto events in the Middle East: questions of identity, territory, self-determination, security, and historical grievance. As a result, the conflict becomes a symbolic extension of local politics, shaping how Unionists and Nationalists perceive each side.

Unionists, who generally support Northern Ireland remaining part of the United Kingdom, tend to identify with Israel for several interconnected reasons. First, they see Israel as a state whose legitimacy is challenged and which must defend itself against security threats – parallels they draw with their own sense of vulnerability during the Troubles. Unionist politicians often place a strong emphasis on law and order, and the right of a recognised state to use force to protect its citizens. Many also highlight the historical experience of Israelis as a minority surrounded by hostile neighbours, mirroring their self-perception as a community needing safeguarding within a largely nationalist island (a view that contributed to partition in the first place). Evangelical Protestantism, which is an important aspect of the more hardline elements of the DUP (the largest unionist party) also provides a religious affinity: some evangelicals view the modern State of Israel as significant within biblical history, reinforcing political sympathy.
Nationalists, by contrast, are more likely to express solidarity with Palestinians. This is rooted in a sense of shared struggle for national self-determination and opposition to what they view as occupation. Irish nationalists often draw analogies between Palestinian aspirations for statehood and their own historical campaign for a united Ireland. Many perceive the West Bank and Gaza as territories subject to military control, resonating with memories of British military presence in Northern Ireland. It was not uncommon during the Troubles (and still today) to see murals in nationalist areas which seek to promote solidarity between the causes of the IRA and the PLO (and other groups such as ETA in the Basque Country).
Flags, which were a prominent feature in some areas of Northern Ireland long before they started being erected in Britain, are often used to express solidarity with the Middle East. It is not uncommon to see Palestinian flags flying in republican (nationalist) areas, and Israel flags in loyalist (unionist) areas.

One Comment

  • Mark Ellis says:

    Thank you – that’s a really helpful explanation. I was a politics student in the 1980’s, and now have a daughter studying politics. I remember travelling to Belfast in the ‘80’s, and in Nationalist areas, you’d note the confluence of republican murals with depictions of the PLO and the ANC struggles. Less overt, but equally existent was a sympathy from some Unionists for Apartheid South Africa as well as for Israel. These are fascinating and complex ideological cross currents, and they are difficult to explain to someone new to the political landscape especially in somewhere as complex as Ireland and ‘the six counties’.

Leave a Reply

Feedback
First
Last